<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What spaghetti code looks like</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/</link>
	<description>Programming productively with open-source tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:49:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grim</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator>Grim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-7173</guid>
		<description>Have to say, often when facing spaghetti code, I often feel like I am not being payed enough to re-write it, but usually I know in the long run it saves me a lot of time when it comes to maintaining and updating the code.

So when faced with spaghetti code I tend to rewrite, comment out old code with a detailed explanation as to the reasons, and then a well commented re-implementation of the original solution.

This then serves as a reference to myself collaborators and original author as to why the original implementation was messy, how and why my code improves on the original code.

Hopefully others then learn from myself and can pick up my style, which although I try to practice good patterns I will openly admit can often become obfuscated to new collaborators.

The only time I see the Spaghetti cycle is when code is re-written by a novice programmer, who might implement some good changes but often creates as much of a mess as the original author.

One of the beauty&#039;s of modern code is that it is no longer the complicated mash of op codes and assembly so there is so much more scope for the code to be considerably optimized, in terms of legibility.

Well happy coding people. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to say, often when facing spaghetti code, I often feel like I am not being payed enough to re-write it, but usually I know in the long run it saves me a lot of time when it comes to maintaining and updating the code.</p>
<p>So when faced with spaghetti code I tend to rewrite, comment out old code with a detailed explanation as to the reasons, and then a well commented re-implementation of the original solution.</p>
<p>This then serves as a reference to myself collaborators and original author as to why the original implementation was messy, how and why my code improves on the original code.</p>
<p>Hopefully others then learn from myself and can pick up my style, which although I try to practice good patterns I will openly admit can often become obfuscated to new collaborators.</p>
<p>The only time I see the Spaghetti cycle is when code is re-written by a novice programmer, who might implement some good changes but often creates as much of a mess as the original author.</p>
<p>One of the beauty&#8217;s of modern code is that it is no longer the complicated mash of op codes and assembly so there is so much more scope for the code to be considerably optimized, in terms of legibility.</p>
<p>Well happy coding people. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Smitts</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-5439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Smitts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-5439</guid>
		<description>Yeah I totally agree that it&#039;s terrible code, very similar to some I saw while working on some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debtsoftware.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;collection management software&lt;/a&gt;, but I&#039;m not familiar with the term &quot;spaghetti&quot; -- how is this code metaphorically like spaghetti?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I totally agree that it&#8217;s terrible code, very similar to some I saw while working on some <a href="http://www.debtsoftware.com/" rel="nofollow">collection management software</a>, but I&#8217;m not familiar with the term &#8220;spaghetti&#8221; &#8212; how is this code metaphorically like spaghetti?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-4196</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-4196</guid>
		<description>Al dente?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al dente?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humeyra</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-3415</link>
		<dc:creator>Humeyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-3415</guid>
		<description>ok, i got it, but it still does not tells us how the spagettie looks like? what&#039;s wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, i got it, but it still does not tells us how the spagettie looks like? what&#8217;s wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Managing Developers 101 &#171; IT Expert Voice</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Managing Developers 101 &#171; IT Expert Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>[...] also need to be aware that â€œToday&#8217;s bad code often is the same as yesterday&#8217;s when spaghetti code was usually the problem,â€ said Welling. â€œToday, bad programmers write deeply nested hierarchy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also need to be aware that â€œToday&#8217;s bad code often is the same as yesterday&#8217;s when spaghetti code was usually the problem,â€ said Welling. â€œToday, bad programmers write deeply nested hierarchy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Bond</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-3231</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-3231</guid>
		<description>The code you published is looks quite ok. It is structured, well formatted, readable and understandable. Maybe a bit inefficient in GUI processing but for sure it cannot be an example of &quot;spaghetti code&quot;!

So, I think you mistaken or published wrong link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The code you published is looks quite ok. It is structured, well formatted, readable and understandable. Maybe a bit inefficient in GUI processing but for sure it cannot be an example of &#8220;spaghetti code&#8221;!</p>
<p>So, I think you mistaken or published wrong link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeÃ§me YazÄ±lar - 01 AralÄ±k 2008 &#124; Taylan Aktepe</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>SeÃ§me YazÄ±lar - 01 AralÄ±k 2008 &#124; Taylan Aktepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>[...] Spaghetti Codes Nedir?  Kodlama tekniÄŸinizi tekrar gÃ¶zden geÃ§irmenize neden olacak bir yazÄ±! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spaghetti Codes Nedir?  Kodlama tekniÄŸinizi tekrar gÃ¶zden geÃ§irmenize neden olacak bir yazÄ±! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Wendelin</title>
		<link>http://eriwen.com/opinion/what-spaghetti-code-looks-like/#comment-1883</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Wendelin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eriwen.com/?p=284#comment-1883</guid>
		<description>@Wouter:
Agreed that I might have used &quot;ugly&quot; instead of &quot;spaghetti&quot;, in either case the code is all over the place. Maybe it&#039;s &quot;paint splatter&quot; code...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wouter:<br />
Agreed that I might have used &#8220;ugly&#8221; instead of &#8220;spaghetti&#8221;, in either case the code is all over the place. Maybe it&#8217;s &#8220;paint splatter&#8221; code&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

